Reassessing the exon–foldon correspondence using frustration analysis

Author:

Galpern Ezequiel A.12ORCID,Jaafari Hana34ORCID,Bueno Carlos3ORCID,Wolynes Peter G.356ORCID,Ferreiro Diego U.12

Affiliation:

1. Protein Physiology Lab, Departamento de Química Biológica, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1428EGA, Argentina

2. Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas - Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1428EGA, Argentina

3. Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005

4. Applied Physics Graduate Program, Smalley-Curl Institute, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005

5. Department of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005

6. Department of Physics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005

Abstract

Protein folding and evolution are intimately linked phenomena. Here, we revisit the concept of exons as potential protein folding modules across a set of 38 abundant and conserved protein families. Taking advantage of genomic exon–intron organization and extensive protein sequence data, we explore exon boundary conservation and assess the foldon-like behavior of exons using energy landscape theoretic measurements. We found deviations in the exon size distribution from exponential decay indicating selection in evolution. We show that when taken together there is a pronounced tendency to independent foldability for segments corresponding to the more conserved exons, supporting the idea of exon–foldon correspondence. While 45% of the families follow this general trend when analyzed individually, there are some families for which other stronger functional determinants, such as preserving frustrated active sites, may be acting. We further develop a systematic partitioning of protein domains using exon boundary hotspots, showing that minimal common exons correspond with uninterrupted alpha and/or beta elements for the majority of the families but not for all of them.

Funder

Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y T#x00E9;cnicas

Universidad de Buenos Aires

NASA | NASA Astrobiology Institute

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3