Reward expectations direct learning and drive operant matching in Drosophila

Author:

Rajagopalan Adithya E.12ORCID,Darshan Ran13,Hibbard Karen L.1,Fitzgerald James E.1,Turner Glenn C.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Janelia Research Campus, HHMI, Ashburn, VA 20147

2. Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205

3. Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Sagol School of Neuroscience, The School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel

Abstract

Foraging animals must use decision-making strategies that dynamically adapt to the changing availability of rewards in the environment. A wide diversity of animals do this by distributing their choices in proportion to the rewards received from each option, Herrnstein’s operant matching law. Theoretical work suggests an elegant mechanistic explanation for this ubiquitous behavior, as operant matching follows automatically from simple synaptic plasticity rules acting within behaviorally relevant neural circuits. However, no past work has mapped operant matching onto plasticity mechanisms in the brain, leaving the biological relevance of the theory unclear. Here, we discovered operant matching in Drosophila and showed that it requires synaptic plasticity that acts in the mushroom body and incorporates the expectation of reward. We began by developing a dynamic foraging paradigm to measure choices from individual flies as they learn to associate odor cues with probabilistic rewards. We then built a model of the fly mushroom body to explain each fly’s sequential choice behavior using a family of biologically realistic synaptic plasticity rules. As predicted by past theoretical work, we found that synaptic plasticity rules could explain fly matching behavior by incorporating stimulus expectations, reward expectations, or both. However, by optogenetically bypassing the representation of reward expectation, we abolished matching behavior and showed that the plasticity rule must specifically incorporate reward expectations. Altogether, these results reveal the first synapse-level mechanisms of operant matching and provide compelling evidence for the role of reward expectation signals in the fly brain.

Funder

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference87 articles.

1. D. W. Stephens, J. R. Krebs, Foraging Theory (Princeton University Press, 1986).

2. Neuroscience of foraging

3. Neural coding of basic reward terms of animal learning theory, game theory, microeconomics and behavioural ecology

4. J. M. Pearce, Animal Learning and Cognition: An Introduction (Psychology Press, ed. 3, 2008).

5. P. W. Glimcher, E. Fehr, Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain (Academic Press, 2013).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3