The driving force behind tool-stone selection in the African Middle Stone Age

Author:

Schmidt Patrick12ORCID,Pappas Ioannis1,Porraz Guillaume34ORCID,Berthold Christoph25,Nickel Klaus G.25ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Early Prehistory and Quaternary Ecology, Department of Geosciences, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72070, Germany

2. Applied Mineralogy, Department of Geosciences, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72074, Germany

3. Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, Ministère de la Culture, UMR 7269 Lampea, Aix-en-Provence F-13094, France

4. Faculty of Humanities, Evolutionary Studies Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2017, South Africa

5. Department of Geosciences, Competence Center Archaeometry–Baden Wuerttemberg, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72074, Germany

Abstract

In the Stone Age, the collection of specific rocks was the first step in tool making. Very little is known about the choices made during tool-stone acquisition. Were choices governed by the knowledge of, and need for, specific properties of stones? Or were the collected raw materials a mere by-product of the way people moved through the landscape? We investigate these questions in the Middle Stone Age (MSA) of southern Africa, analyzing the mechanical properties of tool-stones used at the site Diepkloof Rock Shelter. To understand knapping quality, we measure flaking predictability and introduce a physical model that allows calculating the relative force necessary to produce flakes from different rocks. To evaluate their quality as finished tools, we investigate their resistance during repeated use activities (scraping or cutting) and their strength during projectile impacts. Our findings explain tool-stone selection in two emblematic periods of the MSA, the Still Bay and Howiesons Poort, as being the result of a deep understanding of these mechanical properties. In both cases, people chose those rocks, among many others, that allowed the most advantageous trade-off between anticipated properties of finished tools and the ease of acquiring rocks and producing tools. The implications are an understanding of African MSA toolmakers as engineers who carefully weighed their choices taking into account workability and the quality of the tools they made.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Reference62 articles.

1. Raw material use and behavioral modernity: Howiesons Poort lithic foraging strategies

2. S. H. Ambrose, K. G. Lorenz, “Social and Ecological Models for the Middle Stone Age in Southern Africa” in The Emergence of Modern Humans: An Archaeological Perspective, P. Mellars, Ed. (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 1990), pp. 3–33.

3. The Three Sides of a Biface

4. Organization and Formation Processes: Looking at Curated Technologies

5. D. Bamforth, “Climate, chronology, and the course of war in the Middle Missouri Region of the North American great plains” in Missouri Region of the North American Great Plains. In The Archaeology of Warfare: Prehistories of Raiding and Conquest, E. Arkush, Ed. (University of Florida Press, Gainesville, 2006), pp. 66–100.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3