Coordination dynamics between fuel cell and battery technologies in the transition to clean cars

Author:

Dugoua Eugenie1234ORCID,Dumas Marion1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom

2. Department of Geography and Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom

3. Center for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom

4. Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute Research Network, 81679 Munich, Germany

Abstract

Significant progress reconciling economic activities with a stable climate requires radical and rapid technological change in multiple sectors. Here, we study the case of the automotive industry’s transition to electric vehicles, which involved choosing between two different technologies: fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs) or battery electric vehicles (BEVs). We know very little about the role that such technological uncertainty plays in shaping the strategies of firms, the efficacy of technological and climate policies, and the speed of technological transitions. Here, we explain that the choice between these two technologies posed a global and multisectoral coordination game, due to technological complementarities and the global organization of the industry’s markets and supply chains. We use data on patents, supply-chain relationships, and national policies to document historical trends and industry dynamics for these two technologies. While the industry initially focused on FCEVs, around 2008, the technological paradigm shifted to BEVs. National-level policies had a limited ability to coordinate global players around a type of clean car technology. Instead, exogenous innovation spillovers from outside the automotive sector played a critical role in solving this coordination game in favor of BEVs. Our results suggest that global and cross-sectoral technology policies may be needed to accelerate low-carbon technological change in other sectors, such as shipping or aviation. This enriches the existing theoretical paradigm, which ignores the scale of interdependencies between technologies and firms.

Funder

UKRI | Economic and Social Research Council

Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Reference56 articles.

1. Industrialization and the Big Push

2. Coordination failures and government policy: A model with applications to East Asia and Eastern Europe

3. N. Stern, J. E. Stiglitz, The Social Cost of Carbon, Risk, Distribution, Market Failures: An Alternative Approach (National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, 2021), vol. 15.

4. Competition, cooperation, and innovation

5. Time to get ready: Conceptualizing the temporal and spatial dynamics of formative phases for energy technologies

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3