Americans harbor much less favorable explicit sentiments toward young adults than toward older adults

Author:

Francioli Stéphane P.1ORCID,Shakeri Angela2ORCID,North Michael S.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Management Department, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19148

2. Management and Organizations Department, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, NY 10012

Abstract

Public and academic discourse on ageism focuses primarily on prejudices targeting older adults, implicitly assuming that this age group experiences the most age bias. We test this assumption in a large, preregistered study surveying Americans’ explicit sentiments toward young, middle-aged, and older adults. Contrary to certain expectations about the scope and nature of ageism, responses from two crowdsourced online samples matched to the US adult population ( N = 1,820) revealed that older adults garner the most favorable sentiments and young adults, the least favorable ones. This pattern held across a wide range of participant demographics and outcome variables, in both samples. Signaling derogation of young adults more than benign liking of older adults, participants high on SDO (i.e., a key antecedent of group prejudice) expressed even less favorable sentiments toward young adults—and more favorable ones toward older adults. In two follow-up, preregistered, forecasting surveys, lay participants ( N = 500) were generally quite accurate at predicting these results; in contrast, social scientists ( N = 241) underestimated how unfavorably respondents viewed young adults and how favorably they viewed older adults. In fact, the more expertise in ageism scientists had, the more biased their forecasts. In a rapidly aging world with exacerbated concerns over older adults’ welfare, young adults also face increasing economic, social, political, and ecological hardship. Our findings highlight the need for policymakers and social scientists to broaden their understanding of age biases and develop theory and policies that ponder discriminations targeting all age groups.

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Reference82 articles.

1. R. Cramer The emerging millennial wealth gap. New America (2019). http://newamerica.org/millennials/reports/emerging-millennial-wealth-gap/. Accessed 6 June 2023.

2. H. Lee AR6 synthesis report: Climate change 2023. Summary for Policymakers (2023). https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_SPM.pdf. Accessed 6 June 2023.

3. Intergenerational equity and sustainability

4. Intergenerational Commission A new generational contract. https://intergencommission.org (2018). https://www.resolutionfoundation.org/app/uploads/2018/05/A-New-Generational-Contract-Full-PDF.pdf. Accessed 6 June 2023.

5. I. Ghosh Which Generation Has the Most Influence Over U.S. Politics? Visual Capitalist (2021). https://www.visualcapitalist.com/which-generation-influence-u-s-politics/. Accessed 6 June 2023.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3