How poverty is measured impacts who gets classified as impoverished

Author:

Pu Christine J.1ORCID,Lambin Eric F.234ORCID,Kusimakwe Ian5,Gichia Lenny5,Seme Assefa6,Otupiri Easmon7,Davis Jennifer13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305

2. Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305

3. Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305

4. Earth and Life Institute, University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve B-1348, Belgium

5. International Growth Research and Evaluation Center, Kampala, Uganda

6. School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa 9086, Ethiopia

7. School of Public Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi AK-448, Ghana

Abstract

We test whether the classification of households into poverty categories is meaningfully influenced by the poverty measurement approach that is employed. These classification techniques are widely used by governments, non-profit organizations, and development agencies for policy design and implementation. Using primary data collected in Ethiopia, Ghana, and Uganda, we find almost no agreement in how four commonly used approaches rank 16,150 households in terms of poverty status. This result holds for each country, for urban and rural households, and across the entire socio-economic distribution. Households’ poverty rankings differ by an entire quartile on average. Conclusions about progress toward poverty alleviation goals may depend in large part on how poverty is measured.

Funder

Stanford King Center on Global Development

The Conrad N. Hilton Foundation

The Natural Science and Engineering Council of Canada

The Stanford Interdisciplinary Graduate Fellowship

The Charles H. Leavell Fellowship

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3