Inflation in 2022 did not affect congressional voting, but abortion did

Author:

Mutz Diana C.12ORCID,Mansfield Edward D.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104

2. Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104

Abstract

This study examines voting in the 2022 United States congressional elections, contests that were widely expected to produce a sizable defeat for Democratic candidates for largely economic reasons. Based on a representative national probability sample of voters interviewed in both 2020 and 2022, individuals who changed their vote from one party's congressional candidate to another party’s candidate did not do so in response to the salience of inflation or declining economic conditions. Instead, we find strong evidence that views on abortion were central to shifting votes in the midterm elections. Americans who favored (opposed) legal abortions were more likely to shift from voting for Republican (Democratic) candidates in 2020 to Democratic (Republican) candidates in 2022. Since a larger number of Americans supported than opposed legal abortions, the combination of these shifts ultimately improved the electoral prospects of Democratic candidates. New voters were especially likely to weigh abortion views heavily in their vote-shifting calculus. Likewise, those respondents whose confidence in the US Supreme Court declined from 2020 to 2022 were more likely to shift from voting for Republican to Democratic congressional candidates. We provide direct empirical evidence that changes in support for the Supreme Court, a nonpartisan branch of the federal government, are implicated in partisan voting behavior in another branch of government. We explore the implications of these findings for prevalent assumptions about how economic conditions influence voting, as well as for the relationship between the judiciary and electoral politics.

Funder

Institute for the Study of Citizens and Politics

Browne Center for International Politics

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Reference38 articles.

1. B. Kamisar Economic issues dominate as top issue for voters new poll shows. NBC News 5 July 2022. https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/meetthepressblog/economic-issues-dominate-top-issue-voters-new-poll-shows-rcna36715. Accessed 17 September 2023.

2. W. A. Galston E. Kamarck Inflation politics is clearer than inflation economics. Brookings Institution. 14 January 2022. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/inflation-politics-is-clearer-than-inflation-economics/. Accessed 17 September 2023.

3. The 2022 Elections: A Test of Democracy's Resilience and the Referendum Theory of Midterms

4. The End of Economic Voting? Contingency Dilemmas and the Limits of Democratic Accountability

5. The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3