Trends in US public confidence in science and opportunities for progress

Author:

Lupia Arthur1ORCID,Allison David B.2ORCID,Jamieson Kathleen Hall3ORCID,Heimberg Jennifer4ORCID,Skipper Magdalena5,Wolf Susan M.6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Office of the Vice President for Research and Department of Political Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109

2. Dean, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405

3. Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104

4. Policy and Global Affairs Division, The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Washington, DC 20001

5. Nature, London N1 9XW, United Kingdom

6. University of Minnesota Law School and Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455

Abstract

In recent years, many questions have been raised about whether public confidence in science is changing. To clarify recent trends in the public’s confidence and factors that are associated with these feelings, an effort initiated by the National Academies’ Strategic Council for Research Excellence, Integrity, and Trust (the Strategic Council) analyzed findings from multiple survey research organizations. The Strategic Council’s effort, which began in 2022, found that U.S. public confidence in science, the scientific community, and leaders of scientific communities is high relative to other civic, cultural, and governmental institutions for which researchers regularly collect such data. However, confidence in these institutions has fallen during the previous 5 years. Science’s decline, while real, is similar to or less than that in the other groups. A recent study goes into greater detail by exploring public views of science. From these data, we observe that many of the surveyed U.S. public question the extent to which scientists share their values or overcome personal biases when presenting conclusions. At the same time, large majorities agree on certain types of actions that they want scientists to take. For example, 84% respond that it is “somewhat important” or “very important” for scientists to disclose their funders. Ninety-two percent (92%) offer the same responses to scientists “being open to changing their minds based on new evidence.” Collectively, these data clarify how the U.S. public views science and scientists. They also suggest actions that can affect public confidence in science and scientists in the years to come.

Funder

Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Reference23 articles.

1. Can the public’s trust in science—And scientists—Be restored?;University of Rochester;University of Rochester News Center,2022

2. Confidence in scientists, medical scientists, and other groups and institutions in society;Kennedy B.;Pew Research Center,2023

3. Why do so many Americans distrust science?;American Association of Medical Colleges;AAMC News,2022

4. Factors Assessing Science’s Self-Presentation model and their effect on conservatives’ and liberals’ support for funding science

5. The Strategic Council for Research Excellence, Integrity, and Trust

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3