Abstract
Forecasts of the future cost and performance of technologies are often used to support decision-making. However, retrospective reviews find that many forecasts made by experts are not very accurate and are often seriously overconfident, with realized values too frequently falling outside of forecasted ranges. Here, we outline a hybrid approach to expert elicitation that we believe might improve forecasts of future technologies. The proposed approach iteratively combines the judgments of technical domain experts with those of experts who are knowledgeable about broader issues of technology adoption and public policy. We motivate the approach with results from a pilot study designed to help forecasters think systematically about factors beyond the technology itself that may shape its future, such as policy, economic, and social factors. Forecasters who received briefings on these topics provided wider forecast intervals than those receiving no assistance.
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference42 articles.
1. Long-term forecasts of military technologies for a 20–30 year horizon: An empirical assessment of accuracy;Kott;Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change,2018
2. An examination of factors affecting accuracy in technology forecasts;Fye;Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change,2013
3. E. J. Sylak-Glassman , S. R. Williams , N. Gupta , Current and Potential Use of Technology Forecasting Tools in the Federal Government (Institute for Defense Analyses, Science and Technology Policy Institute, 2016).
4. Committee on Defense Intelligence Agency Technology Forecasts and Reviews, National Research Council , Avoiding Surprise in an Era of Global Technology Advances (The National Academies Press, 2005).
5. Empirical prediction intervals improve energy forecasting
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献