Abstract
In the beginning of modern plant biology, plant biologists
followed a simple model for their science. This model included
important branches of plant biology known then. Of course, plants had
to be identified and classified first. Thus, there was much work on
taxonomy, genetics, and physiology. Ecology and evolution were
approached implicitly, rather than explicitly, through paleobotany,
taxonomy, morphology, and historical geography. However, the burgeoning
explosion of knowledge and great advances in molecular biology, e.g.,
to the extent that genes for specific traits can be added (or deleted)
at will, have created a revolution in the study of plants. Genomics in
agriculture has made it possible to address many important issues in
crop production by the identification and manipulation of genes in crop
plants. The current model of plant study differs from the previous one
in that it places greater emphasis on developmental controls and on
evolution by differential fitness. In a rapidly changing environment,
the current model also explicitly considers the phenotypic variation
among individuals on which selection operates. These are calls for the
unity of science. In fact, the proponents of “Complexity Theory”
think there are common algorithms describing all levels of
organization, from atoms all the way to the structure of the universe,
and that when these are discovered, the issue of scaling will be
greatly simplified! Plant biology must seriously contribute to, among
other things, meeting the nutritional needs of the human population.
This challenge constitutes a key part of the backdrop against which
future evolution will occur. Genetic engineering technologies are and
will continue to be an important component of agriculture; however, we
must consider the evolutionary implications of these new technologies.
Meeting these demands requires drastic changes in the undergraduate
curriculum. Students of biology should be trained in molecular,
cellular, organismal, and ecosystem biology, including all living
organisms.
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference10 articles.
1. Dysfunction in the Neural Circuitry of Emotion Regulation--A Possible Prelude to Violence
2. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (1995) Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change; Scientific-Technical Analyses, eds. Watson, R. T., Zinyowera, M. C., Moss, R. H. & Dokken, D. J. (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.)
3. Bazzaz F A Stinson K A (1999) in Physiological Plant Ecology, eds Scholes J D Barker M G (British Ecological Society, London), pp 283â295.
4. Bazzaz F A (1996) Plants in Changing Environments: Linking Physiological, Population, and Community Ecology (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.).
5. Responses to Nutrient Pulses of Two Colonizers Requiring Different Disturbance Frequencies