Scientific communication in a post-truth society

Author:

Iyengar Shanto,Massey Douglas S.

Abstract

Within the scientific community, much attention has focused on improving communications between scientists, policy makers, and the public. To date, efforts have centered on improving the content, accessibility, and delivery of scientific communications. Here we argue that in the current political and media environment faulty communication is no longer the core of the problem. Distrust in the scientific enterprise and misperceptions of scientific knowledge increasingly stem less from problems of communication and more from the widespread dissemination of misleading and biased information. We describe the profound structural shifts in the media environment that have occurred in recent decades and their connection to public policy decisions and technological changes. We explain how these shifts have enabled unscrupulous actors with ulterior motives increasingly to circulate fake news, misinformation, and disinformation with the help of trolls, bots, and respondent-driven algorithms. We document the high degree of partisan animosity, implicit ideological bias, political polarization, and politically motivated reasoning that now prevail in the public sphere and offer an actual example of how clearly stated scientific conclusions can be systematically perverted in the media through an internet-based campaign of disinformation and misinformation. We suggest that, in addition to attending to the clarity of their communications, scientists must also develop online strategies to counteract campaigns of misinformation and disinformation that will inevitably follow the release of findings threatening to partisans on either end of the political spectrum.

Funder

HHS | NIH | Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference59 articles.

1. Smith TW Son J (2013) Trends in public attitudes about confidence in institutions (NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago). Available at www.norc.org/PDFs/GSS%20Reports/Trends%20in%20Confidence%20Institutions_Final.pdf/. Accessed September 14, 2018.

2. Funk C Kennedy B (2017) Public confidence in scientists has remained stable for decades (Pew Research Center, Washington, DC). Available at www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/06/public-confidence-in-scientists-has-remained-stable-for-decades/. Accessed September 14, 2018.

3. Rainie L (2017) U.S. public trust in science and scientists (Pew Research Center, Washington, DC). Available at www.pewinternet.org/2017/06/27/u-s-public-trust-in-science-and-scientists/. Accessed July 6, 2017.

4. Pew Research Center (2017) Newspaper fact sheet. Available at www.journalism.org/fact-sheet/newspapers/. Accessed July 6, 2018.

5. The science of fake news

Cited by 205 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3