Group size in social-ecological systems

Author:

Casari MarcoORCID,Tagliapietra Claudio

Abstract

Cooperation becomes more difficult as a group becomes larger, but it is unclear where it will break down. Here, we study group size within well-functioning social-ecological systems. We consider centuries-old evidence from hundreds of communities in the Alps that harvested common property resources. Results show that the average group size remained remarkably stable over about six centuries, in contrast to a general increase in the regional population. The population more than doubled, but although single groups experienced fluctuations over time, the average group size remained stable. Ecological factors, such as managing forest instead of pasture land, played a minor role in determining group size. The evidence instead indicates that factors related to social interactions had a significant role in determining group size. We discuss possible interpretations of the findings based on constraints in individual cognition and obstacles in collective decision making.

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference43 articles.

1. Clark CW (1990) Mathematical Bioeconomics: The Optimal Management of Renewable Resources (Wiley, Vancouver).

2. Olson M (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge, MA).

3. The Tragedy of the Commons

4. Ostrom E (2005) Understanding Institutional Diversity (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton).

5. Heterogeneity, Group Size and Collective Action: The Role of Institutions in Forest Management

Cited by 40 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Team size and diversity;Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization;2024-08

2. A meta‐analysis of SES framework case studies: Identifying dyad and triad archetypes;People and Nature;2024-03-28

3. The Data Crowd as a Legal Stakeholder;Oxford Journal of Legal Studies;2024

4. Institutions;Handbook of Cliometrics;2024

5. Substitutability of natural and human capitals: lessons from a simple exploratory model;Ecosystems and People;2023-11-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3