Coevolution of landesque capital intensive agriculture and sociopolitical hierarchy

Author:

Sheehan Oliver,Watts JosephORCID,Gray Russell D.,Atkinson Quentin D.

Abstract

One of the defining trends of the Holocene has been the emergence of complex societies. Two essential features of complex societies are intensive resource use and sociopolitical hierarchy. Although it is widely agreed that these two phenomena are associated cross-culturally and have both contributed to the rise of complex societies, the causality underlying their relationship has been the subject of longstanding debate. Materialist theories of cultural evolution tend to view resource intensification as driving the development of hierarchy, but the reverse order of causation has also been advocated, along with a range of intermediate views. Phylogenetic methods have the potential to test between these different causal models. Here we report the results of a phylogenetic study that modeled the coevolution of one type of resource intensification—the development of landesque capital intensive agriculture—with political complexity and social stratification in a sample of 155 Austronesian-speaking societies. We found support for the coevolution of landesque capital with both political complexity and social stratification, but the contingent and nondeterministic nature of both of these relationships was clear. There was no indication that intensification was the “prime mover” in either relationship. Instead, the relationship between intensification and social stratification was broadly reciprocal, whereas political complexity was more of a driver than a result of intensification. These results challenge the materialist view and emphasize the importance of both material and social factors in the evolution of complex societies, as well as the complex and multifactorial nature of cultural evolution.

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference50 articles.

1. Johnson AW Earle T (2000) The Evolution of Human Societies: From Foraging Group to Agrarian State (Stanford Univ Press, Stanford, CA), 2nd Ed.

2. The Archaeological Evidence for Social Evolution

3. Sanderson SK (2007) Evolution and Its Critics: Deconstructing and Reconstructing an Evolutionary Interpretation of Human Society (Paradigm, Boulder, CO).

4. Trigger BG (1998) Sociocultural Evolution: Calculation and Contingency (Blackwell, Oxford).

5. Parsons T (1966) Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

Cited by 34 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Language follows a distinct mode of extra-genomic evolution;Physics of Life Reviews;2024-09

2. Chapter 10. Intensification does not require modification: Tropical Swidden and the Maya;Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association;2024-07

3. Collective action problems led to the cultural transformation of Sāmoa 800 years ago;PLOS ONE;2024-06-20

4. 6. Ecological Evolutionary Demography;Human Evolutionary Demography;2024-06-14

5. The Past as a Stochastic Process;Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3