How cognitive and reactive fear circuits optimize escape decisions in humans

Author:

Qi Song,Hassabis Demis,Sun Jiayin,Guo Fangjian,Daw Nathaniel,Mobbs Dean

Abstract

Flight initiation distance (FID), the distance at which an organism flees from an approaching threat, is an ecological metric of cost–benefit functions of escape decisions. We adapted the FID paradigm to investigate how fast- or slow-attacking “virtual predators” constrain escape decisions. We show that rapid escape decisions rely on “reactive fear” circuits in the periaqueductal gray and midcingulate cortex (MCC), while protracted escape decisions, defined by larger buffer zones, were associated with “cognitive fear” circuits, which include posterior cingulate cortex, hippocampus, and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, circuits implicated in more complex information processing, cognitive avoidance strategies, and behavioral flexibility. Using a Bayesian decision-making model, we further show that optimization of escape decisions under rapid flight were localized to the MCC, a region involved in adaptive motor control, while the hippocampus is implicated in optimizing decisions that update and control slower escape initiation. These results demonstrate an unexplored link between defensive survival circuits and their role in adaptive escape decisions.

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference42 articles.

1. Cooper WE Jr Blumstein DT , eds (2015) Escaping from Predators: An Integrative View of Escape Decisions (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK).

2. Neuroethological studies of fear, anxiety, and risky decision-making in rodents and humans

3. The Economics of Fleeing from Predators

4. Fanselow MS Lester LS (1988) A functional behavioristic approach to aversively motivated behavior: Predatory imminence as a determinant of the topography of defensive behavior. Evolution and Learning, eds Bolles RC, Beecher MD (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), pp 185–212. Available at psycnet.apa.org/record/1987-98812-010. Accessed January 23, 2017.

5. Fear in animals: a meta-analysis and review of risk assessment

Cited by 97 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3