Author:
Hildebrand Elisabeth A.,Grillo Katherine M.,Sawchuk Elizabeth A.,Pfeiffer Susan K.,Conyers Lawrence B.,Goldstein Steven T.,Hill Austin Chad,Janzen Anneke,Klehm Carla E.,Helper Mark,Kiura Purity,Ndiema Emmanuel,Ngugi Cecilia,Shea John J.,Wang Hong
Abstract
Monumental architecture is a prime indicator of social complexity, because it requires many people to build a conspicuous structure commemorating shared beliefs. Examining monumentality in different environmental and economic settings can reveal diverse reasons for people to form larger social units and express unity through architectural display. In multiple areas of Africa, monumentality developed as mobile herders created large cemeteries and practiced other forms of commemoration. The motives for such behavior in sparsely populated, unpredictable landscapes may differ from well-studied cases of monumentality in predictable environments with sedentary populations. Here we report excavations and ground-penetrating radar surveys at the earliest and most massive monumental site in eastern Africa. Lothagam North Pillar Site was a communal cemetery near Lake Turkana (northwest Kenya) constructed 5,000 years ago by eastern Africa’s earliest pastoralists. Inside a platform ringed by boulders, a 119.5-m2mortuary cavity accommodated an estimated minimum of 580 individuals. People of diverse ages and both sexes were buried, and ornaments accompanied most individuals. There is no evidence for social stratification. The uncertainties of living on a “moving frontier” of early herding—exacerbated by dramatic environmental shifts—may have spurred people to strengthen social networks that could provide information and assistance. Lothagam North Pillar Site would have served as both an arena for interaction and a tangible reminder of shared identity.
Funder
National Science Foundation
National Geographic Society
Wenner-Gren Foundation
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference50 articles.
1. Furholt M (2011) A virtual and a practiced Neolithic? Material culture symbolism, monumentality and identities in the Western Baltic region. Megaliths and Identities: Early Monuments and Neolithic Societies from the Atlantic to the Baltic, eds Furholt M Lüth F Müller J (Rudolf Habelt, Bonn), pp 107–119.
2. Renfrew AC (1973) Social organization in Neolithic Wessex. The Explanation of Culture Change: Models in Prehistory, ed Renfrew AC (Univ of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh), pp 539–558.
3. Monumental architecture: A thermodynamic explanation of symbolic behaviour;Trigger;World Archaeol,1990
4. The construction of monumental landscapes in low-density societies: New evidence from the Early Neolithic of Southern Scandinavia (4000–3300 BC) in comparative perspective (November 5, 2015)
5. Shellmiddens as landmarks: Visibility studies on the Mesolithic of the Muge valley (Central Portugal);Gonçalves;J Anthropol Archaeol,2014
Cited by
53 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献