Abstract
We report a randomized trial of a research ethics training intervention designed to enhance ethics communication in university science and engineering laboratories, focusing specifically on authorship and data management. The intervention is a project-based research ethics curriculum that was designed to enhance the ability of science and engineering research laboratory members to engage in reason giving and interpersonal communication necessary for ethical practice. The randomized trial was fielded in active faculty-led laboratories at two US research-intensive institutions. Here, we show that laboratory members perceived improvements in the quality of discourse on research ethics within their laboratories and enhanced awareness of the relevance and reasons for that discourse for their work as measured by a survey administered over 4 mo after the intervention. This training represents a paradigm shift compared with more typical module-based or classroom ethics instruction that is divorced from the everyday workflow and practices within laboratories and is designed to cultivate a campus culture of ethical science and engineering research in the very work settings where laboratory members interact.
Funder
NSF | Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference38 articles.
1. OPRS , PHS policy on instruction in the responsible conduct of research (RCR). https://oprs.usc.edu/files/2017/04/PHS_Policy_on_RCR1.pdf. Accessed 25 December 2019.
2. Promoting Transparency in Social Science Research
3. Rethinking the meaning of ethics in RCR education;Devereaux;J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ.,2014
4. Six domains of research ethics
5. Scientists behaving badly
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献