Abstract
Eyewitness identifications play an important role in the investigation and prosecution of crimes, but it is well known that eyewitnesses make mistakes, often with serious consequences. In light of these concerns, the National Academy of Sciences recently convened a panel of experts to undertake a comprehensive study of current practice and use of eyewitness testimony, with an eye toward understanding why identification errors occur and what can be done to prevent them. The work of this committee led to key findings and recommendations for reform, detailed in a consensus report entitledIdentifying the Culprit: Assessing Eyewitness Identification. In this review, I focus on the scientific issues that emerged from this study, along with brief discussions of how these issues led to specific recommendations for additional research, best practices for law enforcement, and use of eyewitness evidence by the courts.
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference54 articles.
1. Garrett B (2011) Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong (Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge, MA).
2. Innocence Project (2017) Eyewitness Misidentification. Available at https://www.innocenceproject.org/causes/eyewitness-misidentification. Accessed April 16, 2017.
3. Innocence Project (2017) Cases. Available at https://www.innocenceproject.org/cases. Accessed April 17, 2017.
4. National Research Council (2014) Identifying the Culprit: Assessing Eyewitness Identification (National Academies, Washington, DC).
Cited by
60 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献