Gender disparities in colloquium speakers at top universities

Author:

Nittrouer Christine L.ORCID,Hebl Michelle R.,Ashburn-Nardo Leslie,Trump-Steele Rachel C. E.,Lane David M.,Valian Virginia

Abstract

Colloquium talks at prestigious universities both create and reflect academic researchers’ reputations. Gender disparities in colloquium talks can arise through a variety of mechanisms. The current study examines gender differences in colloquium speakers at 50 prestigious US colleges and universities in 2013–2014. Using archival data, we analyzed 3,652 talks in six academic disciplines. Men were more likely than women to be colloquium speakers even after controlling for the gender and rank of the available speakers. Eliminating alternative explanations (e.g., women declining invitations more often than men), our follow-up data revealed that female and male faculty at top universities reported no differences in the extent to which they (i) valued and (ii) turned down speaking engagements. Additional data revealed that the presence of women as colloquium chairs (and potentially on colloquium committees) increased the likelihood of women appearing as colloquium speakers. Our data suggest that those who invite and schedule speakers serve as gender gatekeepers with the power to create or reduce gender differences in academic reputations.

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference26 articles.

1. Vest CM Birgeneau RJ Bailyn L (1999) A study on the status of women faculty in science at MIT. The MIT Faculty Newsletter: Available at web.mit.edu/fnl/women/women.pdf. Accessed May 19, 2017.

2. Murphy K (2016) Stanford and other elite universities have a gender problem: Too few women professors. The Mercury News. Available at www.mercurynews.com/ci_29567505/stanford-and-other-elite-universities-have-gender-problem. Accessed May 19, 2017.

3. EEOC (2009) Federal laws prohibiting job discrimination questions and answers. US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Available at https://www.eeoc.gov/facts/qanda.html. Accessed May 19, 2017.

4. Valian V (1998) Why So Slow? The Advancement of Women (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).

5. Women in Academic Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3