Abstract
Some aspects of science, taken at the broadest level, are universal in empirical research. These include collecting, analyzing, and reporting data. In each of these aspects, errors can and do occur. In this work, we first discuss the importance of focusing on statistical and data errors to continually improve the practice of science. We then describe underlying themes of the types of errors and postulate contributing factors. To do so, we describe a case series of relatively severe data and statistical errors coupled with surveys of some types of errors to better characterize the magnitude, frequency, and trends. Having examined these errors, we then discuss the consequences of specific errors or classes of errors. Finally, given the extracted themes, we discuss methodological, cultural, and system-level approaches to reducing the frequency of commonly observed errors. These approaches will plausibly contribute to the self-critical, self-correcting, ever-evolving practice of science, and ultimately to furthering knowledge.
Funder
HHS | NIH | National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
HHS | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences
HHS | NIH | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
HHS | NIH | National Institute on Aging
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference110 articles.
1. Hamilton A (1961) The Papers of Alexander Hamilton (Columbia Univ Press, New York).
2. Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting
3. Salsburg D (2017) Errors, Blunders, and Lies (CRC, Boca Raton, FL).
4. Perkel J (2012) Should Linus Pauling’s erroneous 1953 model of DNA be retracted? Retraction Watch. Available at retractionwatch.com/2012/06/27/should-linus-paulings-erroneous-1953-model-of-dna-be-retracted/. Accessed September 21, 2017.
5. Burchfield JD (1990) Lord Kelvin and the Age of the Earth (Univ of Chicago Press, Chicago).
Cited by
116 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献