Metastatic cells are preferentially vulnerable to lysosomal inhibition

Author:

Morgan Michael J.,Fitzwalter Brent E.,Owens Charles R.,Powers Rani K.,Sottnik Joseph L.,Gamez Graciela,Costello James C.,Theodorescu Dan,Thorburn Andrew

Abstract

Molecular alterations that confer phenotypic advantages to tumors can also expose specific therapeutic vulnerabilities. To search for potential treatments that would selectively affect metastatic cells, we examined the sensitivity of lineage-related human bladder cancer cell lines with different lung colonization abilities to chloroquine (CQ) or bafilomycin A1, which are inhibitors of lysosome function and autophagy. Both CQ and bafilomycin A1 were more cytotoxic in vitro to highly metastatic cells compared with their less metastatic counterparts. Genetic inactivation of macroautophagy regulators and lysosomal proteins indicated that this was due to greater reliance on the lysosome but not upon macroautophagy. To identify the mechanism underlying these effects, we generated cells resistant to CQ in vitro. Surprisingly, selection for in vitro CQ resistance was sufficient to alter gene expression patterns such that unsupervised cluster analysis of whole-transcriptome data indicated that selection for CQ resistance alone created tumor cells that were more similar to the poorly metastatic parental cells from which the metastatic cells were derived; importantly, these tumor cells also had diminished metastatic ability in vivo. These effects were mediated in part by differential expression of the transcriptional regulator ID4 (inhibitor of DNA binding 4); depletion of ID4 both promoted in vitro CQ sensitivity and restored lung colonization and metastasis of CQ-resistant cells. These data demonstrate that selection for metastasis ability confers selective vulnerability to lysosomal inhibitors and identify ID4 as a potential biomarker for the use of lysosomal inhibitors to reduce metastasis in patients.

Funder

HHS | NIH | National Cancer Institute

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Cited by 43 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3