Exchanging words: Engaging the challenges of sharing qualitative research data

Author:

DuBois James M.1ORCID,Mozersky Jessica1ORCID,Parsons Meredith1,Walsh Heidi A.1ORCID,Friedrich Annie1,Pienta Amy2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Bioethics Research Center, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110

2. ICPSR, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48106

Abstract

In January 2023, a new NIH policy on data sharing went into effect. The policy applies to both quantitative and qualitative research (QR) data such as data from interviews or focus groups. QR data are often sensitive and difficult to deidentify, and thus have rarely been shared in the United States. Over the past 5 y, our research team has engaged stakeholders on QR data sharing, developed software to support data deidentification, produced guidance, and collaborated with the ICPSR data repository to pilot the deposit of 30 QR datasets. In this perspective article, we share important lessons learned by addressing eight clusters of questions on issues such as where, when, and what to share; how to deidentify data and support high-quality secondary use; budgeting for data sharing; and the permissions needed to share data. We also offer a brief assessment of the state of preparedness of data repositories, QR journals, and QR textbooks to support data sharing. While QR data sharing could yield important benefits to the research community, we quickly need to develop enforceable standards, expertise, and resources to support responsible QR data sharing. Absent these resources, we risk violating participant confidentiality and wasting a significant amount of time and funding on data that are not useful for either secondary use or data transparency and verification.

Funder

HHS | NIH | National Human Genome Research Institute

HHS | NIH | National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference71 articles.

1. National Institutes of Health Final NIH Policy for Data Management and Sharing (2020). https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-21-013.html. Accessed 30 June 2023.

2. National Institutes of Health Office of the Director Supplemental Information to the NIH Policy for Data Management and Sharing: Protecting Privacy when Sharing Human Research Participant (National Institutes of Health Bethesda MD 2022). https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-22-213.html. Accessed 30 June 2023.

3. A Content Analysis of 100 Qualitative Health Research Articles to Examine Researcher-Participant Relationships and Implications for Data Sharing

4. Promises and pitfalls of data sharing in qualitative research

5. Qualitative Data Sharing: Participant Understanding, Motivation, and Consent

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3