Shocks, institutional change, and sustainability transitions

Author:

Johnstone Phil1,Schot Johan2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, BN1 9SL Brighton, UK

2. Centre for Global Challenges, University of Utrecht, 3512 BK Utrecht, The Netherlands

Abstract

The role of exogenous shocks in influencing transition processes is of significant interest to a wide variety of research in sustainability science (SS). Such events disturb and interrupt path-dependent processes in sociotechnical systems. Sometimes this can lead to radical departures from existing trajectories, while at other times existing systems can be more resilient, adapting, or reconfiguring in response to a shock. In this paper, we explore the role that exogenous shocks can have on institutional change. The sustainability transition literature, as shaped by the multilevel perspective, has usually focused on shocks as windows of opportunity (WoO) where alternatives can break through due to strategic action. We offer the perspective of imprinting, which places primary attention on shocks leading to immediate and irreversible institutional change with long-term consequences. The usefulness of this concept is explored by examining the impact of two major shocks to the energy system: World War II and the 1973 oil crisis. It is concluded that the imprinting concept enables analysis that is attentive to how the underlying institutions of a system can be rapidly and deeply altered by the dynamics of exogenous shocks. It is argued that imprinting is an important complementary concept, next to windows of opportunity, for sustainability science research aiming to understand the period of turbulence we are living through.

Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference80 articles.

1. A. Beckett The age of perpetual crisis: How the 2010s disrupted everything but resolved nothing. UpToDate (2019). https://www.theguardian.com/society/2019/dec/17/decade-of-perpetual-crisis-2010s-disrupted-everything-but-resolved-nothing. Accessed 30 August 2022.

2. Sustainability Science: Toward a Synthesis

3. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems

4. F. W. Geels, J. Schot, “The dynamics of transitions: A socio-technical perspective” in Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change, J. Grin, J. Rotmans, J. Schot, Eds. (Routledge, 2010), pp. 11–93.

5. D. C. North Institutions Instituional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge Univ. Press 2006) https:/doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606892.012.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Three archetypical governance pathways for transformative change toward sustainability;Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability;2024-12

2. Resilience perspectives in sustainability transitions research: A systematic literature review;Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions;2024-09

3. System transitions research and sustainable development: Challenges, progress, and prospects;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences;2023-11-13

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3