Author:
Schaefer Mark,Goldman Erica,Bartuska Ann M.,Sutton-Grier Ariana,Lubchenco Jane
Abstract
The concept of nature as capital is gaining visibility in policies and practices in both the public and private sectors. This change is due to an improved ability to assess and value ecosystem services, as well as to a growing recognition of the potential of an ecosystem services approach to make tradeoffs in decision making more transparent, inform efficient use of resources, enhance resilience and sustainability, and avoid unintended negative consequences of policy actions. Globally, governments, financial institutions, and corporations have begun to incorporate natural capital accounting in their policies and practices. In the United States, universities, nongovernmental organizations, and federal agencies are actively collaborating to develop and apply ecosystem services concepts to further national environmental and economic objectives. Numerous federal agencies have begun incorporating these concepts into land use planning, water resources management, and preparations for, and responses to, climate change. Going forward, well-defined policy direction will be necessary to institutionalize ecosystem services approaches in federal agencies, as well as to guide intersector and interdisciplinary collaborative research and development efforts. In addition, a new generation of decision support tools are needed to further the practical application of ecosystem services principles in policymaking and commercial activities. Improved performance metrics are needed, as are mechanisms to monitor the status of ecosystem services and assess the environmental and economic impacts of policies and programs. A greater national and international financial commitment to advancing ecosystem services and natural capital accounting would likely have broad, long-term economic and environmental benefits.
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference31 articles.
1. Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (PL-110-234), Section 2709
2. Davis AI (2010) Ecosystem services and the value of land. Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum 20:339–384
3. United Nations Statistical Commission (2012) System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012: Central Framework (United Nations, New York)
4. Nunes P Kuman P Dedeurwaerdere T , eds (2014) Handbook on the Economics of Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK)
5. Lange G-M (2010) The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development for the New Millennium (World Bank, Washington, DC), Report no. 58847
Cited by
114 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献