Affiliation:
1. Tyumen State University
2. Institute of History and Archaeology of Ural Branch RAS
3. Tyumen Scientific Centre of Siberian Branch RAS
4. Institute of Geography RAS
Abstract
The paper describes research principles and preliminary results of collaborative interdisciplinary research project aimed at the study of everyday cultural landscapes on the periphery of the Yekaterinburg and Tyumen urban agglomerations. The research design of the project implies a paradigm shift from expert reading of the landscapes to communicative learning of the environment, from the perception of the territories in question as resource reservoirs to their exploration as a domain of affordances providing opportunities for endogenous eco-nomic development. In 2020, an expedition worked in the villages of Tobolsk Zabolotye, in the cities of Irbit and Polevskoy of Sverdlovsk Oblast, and in the village of Belozerskoye of Kurgan Oblast. The cases and places deemed perspective in view of the application of the research method were characterized. This paper mainly pro-vides an overview of the methodological principles that underpin our ongoing study, which should be considered only as an outline of the preliminary results of the first year of field work. The main source of the theoretical inspi-ration for the project design was the idea of affordances, coined by the American psychologist James J. Gibson, who studied the problems of perception. The main methodological objective of the project is to apply the theory of affordances to the field study of strategies for everyday landscape choice. In the 2020 field season, the design of the project, envisaging comparative perspective and increased mobility of researchers, was significantly influ-enced by the method of traveling interview. While working in Tobolsk Zabolotye, we followed everyday patterns of mobility, conducting interviews along the way, discussing with the respondents the hierarchy of places and territo-ries, criteria for identifying vernacular regions, capacity of communication channels, modes of the mobility and its limitations. Concurrently, we were gaining the experience of non-discursive, embodied in materiality and corpore-ality, movement and recording local narratives of identity.
Publisher
Tyumen Scientific Center of the SB RAS
Subject
Archaeology,Anthropology,Archaeology
Reference66 articles.
1. Amin, A., Thrift, N. (2002). Cities: Reimaging the Urban. Cambridge: Polity Press.
2. Anderson, J. (2004). Talking whilst walking: A geographical archaeology of knowledge. Area, 36(3), 254–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0004-0894.2004.00222.
3. Appleton, J. (1990). The Symbolism of Habitat: An Interpretation of Landscape in the Arts. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
4. Aston, М. (1985). Interpreting the Landscape. Landscape Archaeology and Local History. London; New York: Routledge.
5. Bates, C., Rhys-Taylor, A. (Eds.) (2017). Walking Through Social Research. Abingdon: Routledge.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献