Strategic Triangles and Balancing in World Politics

Author:

Degterev D. A.1ORCID,Ramich M. S.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN); MGIMO University; Saint Petersburg State University

2. Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN)

Abstract

Trilateral diplomacy is a common format of interaction in international relations, which forms various configurations of the balance of power within the framework of triangles. The concept of a “triangle” is characterized by ambivalence, has a variety of characteristics and principles of formation.The article provides an overview of the theoretical discourse on strategic triangles, as well as of practical examples of trilateral diplomacy of the past and present day. The main characteristics of strategic triangles and the features of changes in their configuration are identified (the case of USA–PRC–USSR triangle). Classification of both symmetric and asymmetric triangles (unicenter and bicenter) are given, the concept of buffer states, as well as regional conflicts with the participation of a great power as a defender, are presented.The most influential countries at the global and regional levels, forming geopolitical triangles, are identified basing on the Composite Index of National Capability (CINC). The concept of pivot states is analyzed permitting to indicate relatively small but geopolitically important countries, forming triangles together with influential states.The main strategic triangles of the modern world order are analyzed, presenting mostly countries of Asia (China, Japan, India), Russian Federation, USA and EU. The main trends of global competition based on geopolitical triangles in the XXI-st century are identified.

Publisher

Center for Crisis Society Studies

Subject

General Medicine

Reference49 articles.

1. Aleskerov  F.T., Kurapova  M.S., Mescheryakova N.G., Mironyuk M.G., Shvydun S.V. (2016). The Network Approach in the Study of Interstate Conflicts. Political Science, no 4, pp. 111–137. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_27685865_15068490.pdf, accessed 21.04.2021 (in Russian).

2. Ali S. (2017). US-Chinese Strategic Triangles. Examining Indo-Pacific Insecurity, Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-57747-0

3. Bogaturov A.D. (1997). Great Powers in the Pacific Ocean. History and Theory of International Relations in East Asia after World War II. (1945–1995), Moscow: Konvert-MONF (in Russian).

4. Brzezinski Z. (1996). Geopolitical Pivot Points. The Washington Quarterly, vol. 19, no 4, pp. 206–216. DOI: 10.1080/01636609609550224

5. Brzezinski Z. (2018). The Grand Chess-board, Moscow: AST (in Russian).

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3