1. by exposure to both 2 4-DAT and 2 6- carcinogenic properties but with similar
2. DAT. In the absence of cellular replication mutagenic activity in S. typhimurium. The
3. in the case of 2 6-DAT-treated mice such major difference between these two chemi
4. damage may have been repaired with a cor- cals in vivo is an induced cell proliferative
5. responding reduction of the Mf to back- response following exposure to 2 4-DAT