Invited Perspective: Why Systematic Reviews, Scoping Reviews, and Evidence-to-Decision Frameworks Are Critical for Transparent, Consistent, Equitable, and Science-Based Decision-Making in Environmental Health-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

登录注册会员服务联系我们

Invited Perspective: Why Systematic Reviews, Scoping Reviews, and Evidence-to-Decision Frameworks Are Critical for Transparent, Consistent, Equitable, and Science-Based Decision-Making in Environmental Health

Published:2024-03 Issue:3 Volume:132 Page:
ISSN:0091-6765
Container-title:Environmental Health Perspectives
language:en
Short-container-title:Environ Health Perspect

Author:

Chartres Nicholas¹^ORCID,Joglekar Rashmi²

Affiliation:

1. School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

2. Program on Reproductive Health and the Environment, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

Publisher

Environmental Health Perspectives

Link

https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/pdf/10.1289/EHP14346

Reference37 articles.

1. A Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials and Recommendations of Clinical Experts

2. Reviews in environmental health: How systematic are they?

3. A review of methods used for hazard identification and risk assessment of environmental hazards

4. Conducting evaluations of evidence that are transparent, timely and can lead to health-protective actions

5. The Navigation Guide Systematic Review Methodology: A Rigorous and Transparent Method for Translating Environmental Health Science into Better Health Outcomes

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线，采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统，可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容，当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种，收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇，并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询！咨询电话：010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP