Formative evaluation in universities: a bibliometric review

Author:

Suárez Obregón Evert SegundoORCID,Sánchez Rojas BelisarioORCID,Santander Rodriguez Kriss VanessaORCID,Alcayhuamán Gil SoniaORCID,Osorio Meniz Patricia DemetriaORCID

Abstract

The present study aimed to conduct a bibliometric analysis of formative assessment in universities between 2004 and 2023. The academic output was examined using bibliometric analysis as the fundamental method in this study. Scopus was used to select 364 papers for the study based on keywords in English (formative AND evaluation AND universities). In terms of percentage increase, the years 2014-2022, with 279 academic papers (76,6 % of the total), had the greatest impact on scientific production. The first country to stand out was Spain (19,7 %) and BMC Medical Education was the most popular publication source (n=13). Of all the authors, López-Pastor, V. was the one who obtained the most citations (65) for his three papers. Of the total number of papers, 99 % were scientific articles, of which 48 % belonged to the social sciences and 10 % to medicine. It can be concluded that formative evaluation in universities has made significant progress in terms of subject variety, authorship, sources and accessible resources. Thus, this bibliometric analysis could serve as a basis for future research.

Publisher

Salud, Ciencia y Tecnologia

Reference31 articles.

1. 1. Asiú, L., Asiú Corrales, A., & Barboza, O. (2021). Evaluación formativa en la práctica pedagógica: una revisión bibliográfica. Conrado, 17(78), 134-139. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1990-86442021000100134

2. 2. Barcia Cedeño, E. I., Loor Loor, J. S., Barcia Garófalo, A. R., & Mendoza Almeida, J. J. (2023). La evaluación formativa en la práctica pedagógica de la Educación Superior: Revisión Sistemática. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 7(3), 1464-1476. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v7i3.6289

3. 3. Beriche, M., & Medina, Z. (2021). La evaluación formativa: su implementación y principales desafíos en el contexto de la escuela y la educación superior. Educación, 27(2), 201-208. https://revistas.unife.edu.pe/index.php/educacion/article/view/2433

4. 4. Caló, L. (2022). Métricas de impacto y evaluación de la ciencia. Rev Perú Med Exp Salud Pública, 39(2), 236-240. https://www.scielosp.org/pdf/rpmesp/2022.v39n2/236-240/es

5. 5. Calderón-Paniagua, D. G. (2020). Impacto de las audiencias públicas ‘La Contraloría te escucha’ como mecanismo de participación ciudadana en el control social de la región de Tacna, 2018-2019. Sincretismo, 1(2). Recuperado a partir de https://revistas.unam.edu.pe/index.php/sincretismo/article/view/23

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3