Abstract
The present study aimed to perform a bibliometric analysis of mentoring as a formative strategy for the personal development of university students published in Scopus between 2003 and 2023. It was a bibliometric data study to measure scientific production, through indicators. Key words in English (Tutorship, formative strategy, personal development, university students) were used to select 82 Scopus documents relevant to the study. According to the results, scientific production peaked in 2019, 2020 and 2022 (n=46; 56 %). In addition, the United States accounted for 25,4 % of all publications (n=30), 4 papers were published in Plos One, and the most cited author was Aral, S.O. (66 citations; n=1 papers). The vast majority of these publications (94 %) were research articles in the fields of social sciences (26 %), psychology (23 %), and arts and humanities (11 %). It is concluded that the research conducted on tutoring as a formative strategy for the personal development of university students shows a growing trend in terms of the number of authors, the number of relevant resources and the diversity of the topics covered. Thus, the bibliometric study provides a starting point for future research by developing a documented argument.
Publisher
Salud, Ciencia y Tecnologia
Reference50 articles.
1. 1. Aburto Jarquín, P. A. (2021). El rol del profesor universitario en el siglo XXI, ¿es necesario de cambios en su actuación como docentetutor- investigador? Revista Compromiso Social, (3), 59-72. https://revistacompromisosocial.unan.edu.ni/index.php/CompromisoSocial/article/view/66
2. 2. Álvarez-Pérez, P., & López-Aguilar, D. (2022). Tutoría y proyecto formativo del alumnado universitario: la importancia de comenzar bien. Revista Brasileira de Orientação Profissional, 23(2), 127-137. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?pid=S1679-33902022000200003&script=sci_arttext
3. 3. Andreani, J. C. (2021a). Neurotomía Periférica Selectiva del Nervio mediano a nivel del brazo. Indicaciones y técnica quirúrgica. NeuroTarget, 15(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.47924/neurotarget20214
4. 4. Andreani, J. C. (2021b). Relevancia anátomo–funcional del núcleo amigdalino. Su fisiología, fisiopatología y orientaciones terapéuticas. NeuroTarget, 15(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.47924/neurotarget20213
5. 5. Angulo, A. (2021). Indicadores de la tutoría integral desde la percepción de los estudiantes de universidades públicas de México. Dilemas contemporáneos: educación, política y valores, 8(2). https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S2007-78902021000100004&script=sci_arttext