Abstract
The intricate and highly variable nature of the internal anatomy of root canals poses significant challenges for effective endodontic treatments. The aim of the study was to interpret the complexity of the internal anatomy of root canals through a narrative literature review. This study adopted an exploratory methodology and was characterized by its observational and descriptive nature, analyzing information from a cross-sectional and retrospective perspective. An exhaustive evaluation of 25 articles was conducted on PubMed, Google Scholar, and Elsevier through ScienceDirect, from 2016 to 2023. This study revealed that a deep understanding of the internal root anatomy and its variations is essential for the success of endodontic treatments, highlighting the importance of advanced diagnostic techniques, such as Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), for identifying anomalies. It was found that anatomical variations, including C-shaped canals, lateral canals, and apical deltas, are more prevalent in posterior teeth. Moreover, anterior lower teeth rarely exhibit more than one root, with Vertucci type I classification predominating in their internal anatomy, which implies less complexity compared to posterior teeth. It concludes that success in endodontics critically depends on detailed knowledge of the internal root anatomy. The findings emphasize the need to apply precise diagnostic techniques and adapt treatment strategies to the specific anatomical complexity of each tooth, especially in those with more complex root configurations
Publisher
Salud, Ciencia y Tecnologia
Reference23 articles.
1. 1. Siqueira Junior JF, Rôças IDN, Marceliano-Alves MF, Pérez AR, Ricucci D. Unprepared root canal surface areas: causes, clinical implications, and therapeutic strategies. Braz Oral Res. 2018 Oct 18;32(suppl 1):e65. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0065.
2. 2. Kartik SN, Shetty K, Vergis BA, Natarajan S, D'Souza JL. Analysis of root morphology and internal anatomy of 400 maxillary first premolars using cone-beam computed tomography in an Indian Dravidian subpopulation: An ex vivo study. J Conserv Dent. 2022 Sep-Oct;25(5):487-491. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_158_22.
3. 3. Fonseca Tavares WL, de Oliveira Murta Pedrosa N, Moreira RA, Braga T, de Carvalho Machado V, Ribeiro Sobrinho AP, Amaral RR. Limitations and Management of Static-guided Endodontics Failure. J Endod. 2022 Feb;48(2):273-279. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2021.11.004.
4. 4. Costamagna P, Carpegna G, Bianchi C, Baldi A, Pasqualini D, Scotti N, Alovisi M. Endodontic Treatment of a Molar with Peculiar Anatomy: Case Study with CBCT and 3D Printed Model. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Dec 1;22(12):1477-1482.
5. 5. Huang XX, Fu M, Yan GQ, Hou BX. [Study on the incidence of lateral canals and sealing quality in the apical third roots of permanent teeth with failed endodontic treatments]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Apr 9;53(4):243-247. Chinese. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2018.04.006.