Quality Management System for Higher Education: A Systematic Review

Author:

Andrade-Girón Daniel CristóbalORCID,Marín-Rodriguez William JoelORCID,Zúñiga-Rojas MarceloORCID,Susanibar-Ramirez Edgar TitoORCID,Calvo-Rivera Irina PatriciaORCID

Abstract

Global organizations currently face the challenge of managing massive volumes of data and knowledge efficiently. The consolidation of the knowledge society is manifesting itself in an evident way, driving university institutions to reconfigure both their academic and administrative processes in order to achieve excellence in their functions. In this context, the central purpose of this research is to present a comprehensive systematic review of the implementation of Quality Management Systems (QMS) in the field of higher education. In order to address this issue with the utmost rigor, a systematic review was carried out incorporating the fundamental pillars outlined in the PRISMA statement. In an initial phase, a selection of 883 papers was carried out from preeminent documentary sources, namely: Scopus, IEEE and Web Science. Subsequently, the final review was confined to a corpus of 23 research papers. The results derived from this thorough review show that the paradigm embodied by the ISO 9001 model prevails as the most predominant approach, with 69.56% representativeness in the set of studies analyzed. In contrast, the EFQM, TQM and Malcom Baldrige models showed a more modest presence, each accounting for 4.35% of the total number of studies examined. In addition, fundamental aspects have been identified that both facilitate and condition the process of implementing QMS.

Publisher

Salud, Ciencia y Tecnologia

Reference56 articles.

1. Moreno MR, Valencia JL. High-quality accreditation resolutions: An overview of challenges and opportunities for Higher Education Institutions in Colombia. Human Review. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades. 2023;1-13. https://doi.org/10.37467/revhuman.v12.4724

2. Naderi A. Higher education production function: applications, challenges, and prospects. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education. 2023;21(3):1-29. https://journal.irphe.ac.ir/article_702875_en.html?lang=fa

3. Vera F. Integración de la Inteligencia Artificial en la Educación superior: Desafíos y oportunidades. TRANSFORMAR ELECTRONIC JOURNAL. 2018;4(1):5-10. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4326-1660

4. Wilger A. Quality assurance in higher education: A literature review. National Center for Postsecondary Improvement. 1997;1-12. http://web.stanford.edu/group/ncpi/documents/pdfs/6-03b_qualityassurance.pdf

5. Tannock JD. Industrial Quality Standards and Total Quality Management in Higher Education. European Journal of Engineering Education. 2007;16(4):353-360. DOI: 10.1080/03043799108939540

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3