Abstract
Introduction: Currently, information technologies have one characteristic in common: their volatility. This is why it is important that companies have methodologies that allow adequate management of the continuity of the services offered through them.Objective: In this sense, the purpose of this systematic literature review is to identify the most appropriate methodologies that can be implemented in companies to deal with these unforeseen interruptions.Method: With a study based on a PICO question, the search for relevant literature in a scientific database was proposed using a search equation based on keywords.Results: The studies offer qualitative results that mainly allow reducing response times before incidents of unforeseen interruptions, among the most notable is that the proposed systems help increase the success rate of recovery procedures by 80%, allow identifying and apply integration technologies that allow improving business continuity systems, among others. However, there is a knowledge gap for which the implementation of these methods is suggested for future proposals in order to achieve quantitative results that can be presented through metrics.Conclusions: In conclusion, the present systematic literature review carried out the analysis and a comparison of the methodologies proposed by the authors and analyzes the results achieved in each of them, suggesting that 69% of the articles mention an origin of the associated interruptions to logical failures, 75% of the studies indicate that business continuity plans mostly have a preventive focus and 44% suggest continuous testing of plans to ensure their effectiveness.
Publisher
Salud, Ciencia y Tecnologia
Reference22 articles.
1. Magnusson C, Yngström L. Method for Insuring IT Risks. In: 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, [Internet]. Hawai - EEUU: IEEE Computer Society; 2004. p. 1–8. Available from: https://www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings-article/hicss/2004/205670186c/12OmNzwpUlC
2. Taherdoost H. A Review on Risk Management in Information Systems: Risk Policy, Control and Fraud Detection. Electronics (Basel) [Internet]. 2021 Dec; 10(24):1–24. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9292/10/24/3065/htm
3. Lumpp T, Schneider J, Holtz J, Mueller M, Lenz N, Biazetti A, et al. From high availability and disaster recovery to business continuity solutions. IBM Systems Journal [Internet]. 2008; 47(4):605–19. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5386516
4. Kitchenham B. Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews [Internet]. BG - UK; 2004. Available from: https://www.inf.ufsc.br/~aldo.vw/kitchenham.pdf
5. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ [Internet]. 2021 Mar 29; 372(71):1–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33782057/
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献