How Would Preferential Voting Have Changed Taiwan’s 2024 Presidential Election?

Author:

Rich Timothy S.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Political Science

Abstract

Would the results of Taiwan’s 2024 presidential election have differed under preferential voting rules? Observers assume that the split in the opposition virtually guaranteed Lai Ching-te’s victory, but no analysis has aimed to measure ranked preferences across the three presidential candidates. This analysis combines original pre-election survey data that includes preference ordering of candidates with simulation analysis of the actual election results under the alternative vote and Borda count systems. The original survey finds Ko Wen-je would have won under both preferential systems, while simulating preference ordering using the 2024 election results suggests Lai would have won under alternative vote but lost to Hou You-ih under Borda count.

Publisher

University of Texas at Austin Center for Taiwan Studies

Reference21 articles.

1. A Theory of Strategic Voting in Runoff Elections;Laurent Bouton;American Economic Review,2013

2. Right vs. Left: Ideology and Psychological Motives in the Chinese Cultural Context;Rong Chen;Journal of Social and Political Psychology,2023

3. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State;Maurice Duverger,1954

4. The original Borda count and partial voting;Peter Emerson;Social Choice and Welfare,2013

5. The case for the alternative vote;Peter Hain;Representation,1997

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3