Affiliation:
1. Institute of Fire Engineers, Adelaide, South Australia
2. 2. Fire and Rescue New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales. 3. Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, New South Wales.
Abstract
In order to explore the commonalities and differences in decision-making across emergency services organisations, a systematic literature review of over 10,000 peer reviewed English-language studies was undertaken looking at sense-making and critical decision-making in police, military, ambulance and firefighting contexts. The insights gained and lessons learnt from this research enabled the development of the Situation, Context, Decision, Plan, Act, Review or S(CD)PAR framework. The new framework is hazard and service agnostic, not only incorporating complexity analysis and contextual factors but also being applicable to the full spectrum of emergency management operations. This paper presents the operational translation of the theoretical S(CD)PAR framework into a multi-sector end-user decision SPAR(CD) model that can guide operational decision-making as well as the development of policy, procedures and learning and assessment tools. While the S(CD)PAR framework and SPAR(CD) model have been developed based on research in high-consequence and low-time emergency services and military environments, they are equally applicable in other environments including business contexts and boardrooms wherever decisions are made. This research and subsequent model are important as it supports a common approach to decision-making and also provides a foundation for teaching and assessing evidence-based decision-making across multiple contexts.
Publisher
Australian Institute for Disaster Resilience
Subject
Safety Research,Health Professions (miscellaneous),Emergency Medical Services
Reference43 articles.
1. Bakken B & Gilljam M 2003, Dynamic intuition in military command and control: why it is important, and how it should be developed. Cognition, Technology and Work, vol. 5. no, 3, pp.197–205.
2. Banks A, Gamblin D & Hutchinson H 2020, Training fast and frugal heuristics in military decision making. Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol. 34, no. 3, pp.699–709.
3. BBC 2023, Hillsborough disaster: Report reply expected in spring - Home Office. At: www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-merseyside-64488828.
4. Bonner H 2018, The decision process: police officers’ search for information in dispute encounters. Policing and Society, vol. 28, no. 1, pp.90–113.
5. Bryant D 2006, Rethinking OODA: Toward a Modern Cognitive Framework of Command Decision Making. Military Psychology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp.183–206.