Affiliation:
1. University College London, London, United Kingdom, University of Agder, Kristians, Norway
Abstract
A disaster is typically defined as a situation requiring external assistance, under the (contestable) assumption that the situation must affect people and society to be a disaster. Animals and their habitats are part of society and humans connect with them, so animals and their habitats are part of all disaster-related activities. This straightforward statement has produced divergent theories, policies and practices including challenges to categories, labels and divisions for humans and non-humans. This paper collates many practitioner aspects regarding animals and habitats in disaster-related activities. It assists in understanding and training for situations involving non-humans before, during and after a disaster. Five categories, sometimes overlapping, are provided of (non-human) animals and their habitats affected by disaster-related activities: companion animals, service animals, livelihood animals, captive animals and wildlife and wildland animals. Other aspects emerge about animals and habitats contributing to disasters and to disaster-related activities. Some ethical and practical issues are discussed regarding rights for, responsibilities of and disaster definitions relevant to dealing with animals during disasters.
Publisher
Australian Institute for Disaster Resilience
Subject
Safety Research,Health Professions (miscellaneous),Emergency Medical Services
Reference71 articles.
1. Akabayashi A & Hayashi Y 2012, Mandatory evacuation of residents during the Fukushima nuclear disaster: an ethical analysis, Journal of Public Health, vol. 34, no. 3, pp.348–351.
2. Anderson A & Anderson L 2010, Rescued: Saving Animals from Disaster, New World Library, Novato.
3. Anonymous 2015, One (Mis)step from (Personal) Disaster: Being Blind, in Kelman I & Stough L M (eds), Disability and Disaster: Explorations and Exchanges, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp.53–57.
4. Arluke A & Sanders CR, 1996, Regarding Animals, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
5. Bardsley DK, Prowse TAA & Siegfriedt C 2019, Seeking knowledge of traditional Indigenous burning practices to inform regional bushfire management, Local Environment, vol. 24, no. 8, pp.727–745.