Abstract
Abstract:In Marginal Gains (2004), Jane Guyer traces the logic of African socioeconomic practices that have long confounded attempts by modern states to impose what she terms “formalization.” Nowhere is the tension between pragmatically “informal” economic life and putatively “formal” state structures more evident than in the domain of poverty interventions, which typically aim to bring state institutional power to bear precisely on those who are most excluded from the “formal sector.” This article offers a preliminary analysis of some new rationalities of poverty alleviation observable in recent South African political and policy discourse. I will argue that new sorts of programmatic thinking about poverty represent a new development within (and not simply against) neoliberalism, and that they seek, by abandoning the regulatory and normalizing functions usually associated with social assistance, to bring the formal and the informal into a new sort of relation.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Anthropology,Cultural Studies
Reference31 articles.
1. Republic of South Africa. 2005. Labour Force Survey, September 2005. Statistics South Africa. Pretoria: Government of the Republic of South Africa.
2. Tilton Doug . 2005. BIG Fact Sheet #1. Capetown: BIG Coalition. www.big.org.za/index.php?option=ardcles&task=viewarticle&artid=5.
3. The Biometric State: The Promise and Peril of Digital Government in the New South Africa
Cited by
118 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献