Author:
Piccinini Gualtiero,Scott Sam
Abstract
As our data will show, negative existential sentences containing socalled empty names evoke the same strong semantic intuitions in ordinary speakers and philosophers alike.(1)(a) Santa Claus does not exist.(b) Superman does not exist.(c) Clark Kent does not exist.Uttering the sentences in (1) seems to say something truth-evaluable, to say something true, and to say something different for each sentence. A semantic theory ought to explain these semantic intuitions.The intuitions elicited by (1) are in apparent conflict with the Millian view of proper names. According to Millianism, the meaning (or ‘semantic value’) of a proper name is just its referent. But empty names, such as ‘Santa Claus’ and ‘Superman’, appear to lack a referent. If they do, then Millianism entails that they have no meaning.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Millianism, Empty Names and The No-Proposition View;Temaşa Erciyes Üniversitesi Felsefe Bölümü Dergisi;2023-12-15
2. Confused Terms in Ordinary Language;Journal of Logic, Language and Information;2019-09-04
3. Russellians can have a no proposition view of empty names;Inquiry;2017-09-18
4. Pragmatics of No Reference;Mind & Language;2015-02
5. Empty Names and Pragmatic Millianism;Thought: A Journal of Philosophy;2014-03