How do responsible universities perceive their social engagement? In search of signs of Creating Shared Value by the University

Author:

Karwowska ElżbietaORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesUniversity social responsibility still lacks legitimisation and is perceived as a burden that hinders academics from doing research and teaching. Creating Shared Value by the University may serve as a tool to motivate universities to engage in initiatives for society, as this is beneficial for both parties. Yet, some researchers perceive the creation of economic value as inappropriate for academia. Thus, it was interesting to examine how the world's best universities elaborate on this matter.Material and methodsA thematic analysis of textual data published online by universities in the top 30 in THE Impact Rankings 2022 has been conducted to determine if they create shared value and what benefits they create or expect.ResultsSigns of indirect Creating Shared Value by the University were observed in the dataset. Some universities create social and economic benefits from the same initiatives, mainly strategic. The observed benefits are both intangible and tangible, but most are related to increasing brand value: receiving recognition and awards, building reputation, strengthening competitive advantage, boosting brand attractiveness, and employer branding. Universities modestly mention that they gain tangible benefits, such as an expansion of research funds, and earned or passive income, which may point out that such values are not perceived as suitable in an academic context yet.ConclusionsThe results shed new light on the perception of creating economic value in academia, indicating that CSVU could be a legitimate tool to develop the theory and practice of USR. Still, results suggest that any CSVU framework should focus primarily on intangible benefits.

Publisher

Alcide De Gasperi University of Euroregional Economy in Jozefow, Poland

Reference32 articles.

1. Alzyoud, S. A. and Bani-Hani, K. (2015). Social responsibility in higher education institutes. European Scientific Journal, 3,11(8).

2. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology,3 (2), 77-101.

3. Chen, X., Wang, C., and Li, S. (2022). The impact of supply chain finance on corporate social responsibility and creating shared value: a case from the emerging economy. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print).

4. Chun, B.J. (2017). Shared Value Creation Strategy Proposed by the Management Association: From CSR to CSV. Seoul: Pakyoungsa, pp. 2–38.

5. Clark, B. R. (2004). Sustaining change in universities: Continuities in case studies and concepts. Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3