Digital Arbitration Is a New Way of Dispute Resolution for the Unified Digital Space of the EAEU: Political, Philosophical and Legal Aspect

Author:

ERMAKOVA ElenaORCID,PROTOPOPOVA Olga

Abstract

The article discusses the theoretical legal foundations of a new type of arbitration – digital arbitration (or blockchain arbitration). The author formulated the concept of digital arbitration and analyzed the differences between digital arbitration and traditional arbitration from the point of view of theories about the legal nature of arbitration. In particular, the author believes that the term digital arbitration (blockchain arbitration) is used in three meanings. Firstly, the term digital arbitration refers to a way to protect the rights arising from smart contracts. This method is considered as an alternative to those methods that imply the need to seek judicial protection from the State or traditional arbitration. Secondly, digital arbitration refers to the body that organizes the digital trial of a legal dispute. And, thirdly, this concept denotes an artificial intelligence agent (robot), which considered the dispute submitted for its resolution. The author believes that due to its features, digital arbitration can be recommended as an alternative way to resolve disputes in the digital space of the EAEU.

Publisher

Armenian State Pedagogical University after Khacatur Abovyan

Subject

Philosophy

Reference24 articles.

1. Advani, H., Lampwala, A., Garg, R. (2022). Smart contracts and blockchain arbitration: Smart solutions paving the way for a better dispute resolution mechanism. SCC OnLine Blog. Retrieved August 10, 2023, from https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2022/04/25/smart-contracts-and-blockchain-arbitration-smart-solutions-paving-the-way-for-a-better-dispute-resolution-mechanism/

2. Aouidef, Y., Ast, F., A., & Deffains, B. (2021). Decentralized justice: A comparative analysis of blockchain online dispute resolution projects. Front. Blockchain, 4, 564551. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2021.564551

3. Davydenko, D. L. (2013). Sootnosheniye mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha s drugimi alternativnymi sposobami razresheniya mezhdunarodnykh kommercheskikh sporov (Correlation of international commercial arbitration with other alternative ways of resolving international commercial disputes, in Russian). Bulletin of International Commercial Arbitration, 1(7), 8-41.

4. Du, G. (2022). Chinese arbitral institution awards Chinaís first property dispute case in the Metaverse. China Justice Observer. Retrieved August 10, 2023, from https://www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/chinese-arbitral-institution-awards-china-s-first-property-dispute-case-in-the-metaverse.

5. Erpyleva, N.Yu. (2013). Mezhdunarodnyy kommercheskiy arbitrazh: pravovyye osnovy funktsionirovaniya (International commercial arbitration: legal bases of functioning, in Russian). International Law, 1, 1-74. doi: 10.7256/2306-9899.2013.1.545

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3