Affiliation:
1. California State University, Fullerton
2. University of California, Berkeley
Abstract
This paper addresses the interpretation of data that are contaminated by self-selected samples and/or lack of experimental control. Wainer (1989) reviewed different methods for treating self-selected samples and concluded that the most defensible approach is to model the process that caused the data to be missing. In concert with Wainer, the present paper emphasizes the value of specifying models; however, the theses of the present paper are that (a) any analysis should be interpreted in the context of a set of rival theoretical models, (b) these models should allow latent mediating variables that are imperfectly measured by observed variables, and (c) modeling brings clarity to the conclusion that confounded data can be misleading. Simple models clarify the limitations on conclusions one might otherwise attempt to draw from tainted data.
Publisher
American Educational Research Association (AERA)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Anthropology,History,Language and Linguistics,Cultural Studies
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献