Affiliation:
1. University of Southern California
2. University of California, Los Angeles
3. Northern Arizona University
4. University of California, Berkeley
5. Rochester Institute of Technology
Abstract
Despite a growing body of research on the outcomes of holistic admissions and eliminating standardized test score requirements throughout education, few have documented how organizations transition to holistic review. Implementation, however, may help explain variation in impacts of holistic admissions. This article draws upon theories of organizational routines to examine adoption of holistic review in 13 STEM PhD programs from five universities. We conducted 60- to 90-min interviews with admissions leaders, including a COVID-19 transcript review activity. Data reveal change is multilevel, involving new policy/structural, practice/cultural, and cognitive/interpretive routines, which carry promise for disrupting institutionalized inequities where the politics of changing these routines can be managed. We discuss implications for policy, organizational practice, and future research on academic evaluations.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
American Educational Research Association (AERA)
Reference105 articles.
1. American Sociological Association. (2021). Reconsidering the use of the Graduate Record Examination (GRE) in Graduate School Admissions Decisions. https://www.asanet.org/sites/default/files/gre_statement_march_2021-final_format.pdf
2. Association of American Medical Colleges. (2010). Roadmap to diversity: Integrating holistic review practices into medical school admission processes.
3. Association of American Medical Colleges. (2014). Roadmap to diversity and educational excellence.
4. Testing for Bias in Graduate School Admissions
5. Race and Stratification in College Enrollment Over Time