On the Vague Meaning of “Gender” in Education Research: The Problem, Its Sources, and Recommendations for Practice

Author:

Glasser Howard M.1,Smith John P.2

Affiliation:

1. HOWARD M. GLASSER is a doctoral candidate at Michigan State University, Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education Department, 401 Erickson Hall, East Lansing, MI 48824; . His research focuses on issues related to single-sex education, equity, and social justice, particularly in science and mathematics education.

2. JOHN P. SMITH III is an associate professor at Michigan State University, Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education Department, 513H Erickson Hall, East Lansing, MI 48824; . He is also the director of the Educational Psychology and Educational Technology Doctoral Program. His research focuses on the nature and development of people’s knowledge and understanding of mathematics, the nature of skilled mathematics teaching, and factors that shape mathematics curriculum and teaching in U.S....

Abstract

Writers for both academic and popular audiences often use the term gender when considering differences between the educational experiences of male and female students, and the distinction often appears to be based on a traditional understanding of the term sex. The authors of this article argue that gender and sex should be distinguished more clearly in education research and that the pattern of unclear, conflated, and even synonymous use of the terms has slowed progress in understanding how gender influences students’ educational experiences. The authors present evidence of conflated use, review the wide diversity in orienting perspectives and definitions of gender, show how current American Psychological Association publication guidelines fail to provide clear guidance on the use of the terms, and make recommendations for improving research practice.

Publisher

American Educational Research Association (AERA)

Subject

Education

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3