Are We Moving the Needle on Racial Disproportionality? Measurement Challenges in Evaluating School Discipline Reform

Author:

Bottiani Jessika H.ORCID,Kush Joseph M.ORCID,McDaniel Heather L.1,Pas Elise T.2,Bradshaw Catherine P.1

Affiliation:

1. University of Virginia

2. Johns Hopkins University

Abstract

Challenges in the measurement of racial disparities in school discipline are a significant barrier to identifying policy and programmatic reforms that are effective at closing gaps. This article reviews key measurement issues and presents a set of empirical analyses as an illustrative case study. Specifically, we reframe the interpretation of discipline data in light of initiatives designed to reduce racial discipline disparities. We also characterize common metrics and recognize several additional ones for use in discipline disproportionality outcome evaluations. Leveraging a statewide policy reform as an example, we report findings from a quasi-experimental evaluation, which demonstrated that the various metrics can point to differing conclusions. We conclude with proposed guiding principles for the selection and use of discipline disproportionality metrics in evaluations.

Funder

Institute of Education Sciences

William T. Grant Foundation

Publisher

American Educational Research Association (AERA)

Subject

Education

Reference76 articles.

1. Allman K. L., Slate J. R. (2011). School discipline in public education: A brief review of current practices. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 6(2). https://cnx.org/contents/104795f8-7143-42eb-8f1c-5aa3f6054fff@1/School-Discipline-in-Public-Education-A-Brief-Review-of-Current-Practices

2. Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools?: An evidentiary review and recommendations.

3. Check & Connect: The importance of relationships for promoting engagement with school

4. An exploration of the relationships between student racial background and the school sub-contexts of office discipline referrals: a critical race theory analysis

5. Systemic Transformation from the Ground–Up

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3