Affiliation:
1. Harvard University
2. College Board
3. University of Virginia
4. Georgia State University and IZA
Abstract
Pundits, politicians, and academics have long worried about potentially low rates of civic participation among STEM-oriented students. Does studying STEM actually decrease the odds that young people will be actively involved in democracy? To answer this question, we created a dataset of over 23 million students in the United States, matched to national validated voting records. This novel dataset is the largest known individual-level dataset in the United States, connecting high school and college students to voting outcomes. It also contains a rich set of demographic and academic variables, to account for many of the common issues related to students’ selection into STEM coursework. We consider two measures of STEM participation: Advanced Placement (AP) exam taking in high school and college major. Using both measures, we find that, across model specifications, the estimated relationships between STEM and voting are small in magnitude—about the same effect size as a single get-out-the-vote mailer. Our analyses demonstrate that, on average, marginally more STEM coursework in high school and college does not contribute noticeably to the low voting rates among young people in the United States.
Publisher
American Educational Research Association (AERA)
Reference80 articles.
1. Is Economics Coursework, or Majoring in Economics, Associated with Different Civic Behaviors?
2. O Brother, Where Start Thou? Sibling Spillovers on College and Major Choice in Four Countries*
3. Higher Education and Cultural Liberalism: Regression Discontinuity Evidence from Romania
4. AP Program Participation & Performance Data (2020).
5. Astin A. W. (1997). What matters in college?Josey Bass. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/What+Matters+in+College%3F%3A+Four+Critical+Years+Revisited-p-9780787908386#:~:text=a%20dummy%20description.Description,colleges%20can%20enhance%20that%20development