Affiliation:
1. Carnegie Mellon University
Abstract
Scientific laws are typically presented with corresponding proofs to justify their correctness and illustrate scientific reasoning. The form of these proofs is commonly a series of logically related equations. This research examined how this equation-based format influences proof comprehension. This was done by comparing learners’ ability to solve problems after studying typical equation-based proofs and matching proofs with equations replaced by verbal equivalents (a verbal format). Verbal proofs produced better performance than equation-based proofs on problems relating to both equations and nonequational proof content. These results suggest that equations in proofs cause learners to shift attention away from nonequational content and that learners have more difficulty processing equations than verbal statements containing the same content.
Publisher
American Educational Research Association (AERA)
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献