Affiliation:
1. Johns Hopkins University
2. University of New Mexico
3. University of California, Santa Barbara
Abstract
Disabled students have historically been dehumanized in education, generally, and in research and practice related to school mathematics (K–12), particularly. Typically, they are only offered access to low-rigor school mathematics emphasizing rote procedures and narrow skills, often segregated physically and socially from their nondisabled peers. Educators are crucial to the humanization of disabled students via anti-ableist and antiracist work toward systemic transformation. The purpose of this review is to take stock of the current knowledge base of educator and disability research concerning school mathematics, recommending directions for humanizing future research and practice. Through a humanizing mathematics education lens, we analyze 61 articles involving educators, disabilities, and school mathematics published during the decade between 2007 and 2016. Results of our analysis point to not only the continued perpetuation of dehumanizing approaches and positioning but also substantial shifts toward humanization in mathematics education for disabled students. Over half of the studies reflected humanizing shifts. Yet, overwhelmingly, studies continue to avoid meaningful intersectional considerations of race and disability.
Publisher
American Educational Research Association (AERA)
Reference162 articles.
1. Student teachers’ mathematics attitudes, authentic investigations and use of metacognitive tools
2. The Abacus: Instruction by Teachers of Students with Visual Impairments
3. American Educational Research Association. (2017). Disability studies in education SIG 143, SIG purpose. AERA. http://www.aera.netSIG143Disability-Studies-in-Education-SIG-143
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献