Abstract
Sources for thinking about and doing new paradigm research are reviewed. The discussion includes a large variety of nontraditional approaches that directly address the role of subjectivity and consensus in research. Sources include literature on traditional research methods, qualitative methods, humanistic psychology, and action research. The review is organized in terms of the personal and social processes that affect an investigator, including a consideration of how our construction of reality depends on the methods of study we choose.
Publisher
American Educational Research Association (AERA)
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献