Comment: “Science” Rejects Postmodernism

Author:

Pierre Elizabeth Adams St1

Affiliation:

1. University of Georgia, Language Education Department, 125 Aderhold Hall, Athens, GA 30602; Her research agenda is grounded in poststructural theories of language and focuses on three related and overlapping areas: language and literacy studies, poststructural feminism, and qualitative research methodology. Specific projects are the construction of subjectivity in older women, the reading practices of adult expert readers, literacy practices in adult women’s book clubs, and the critique of conventional...

Abstract

The National Research Council report Scientific Research in Educationclaims to present an inclusive view of science as it responds to federal government attempts to legislate educational research. This author argues, however, that the report in fact narrowly defines scienceas positivism and methodologyas quantitative. These definitions are made possible by the outright rejection of postmodernism and the rejection by omission of other theories including queer, feminist, race, postcolonial, critical, and poststructural theories. The chief issue in this report is, in fact, not “science” but the larger issue of epistemology, from which methodologies like conventional science emerge. After using postmodern analyses to illustrate the danger of the report’s normalizing and totalizing discourse, this author urges researchers to be on guard against those who would reject diverse epistemologies and methodologies in educational research

Publisher

American Educational Research Association (AERA)

Subject

Education

Cited by 77 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Reading for post qualitative inquiry;International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education;2024-04-14

2. The Paradigm Wars Reconsidered;Handbook of Critical Education Research;2023-06-01

3. Grounding Qualitative Medical Research in Coherence, Not Standards;The Qualitative Report;2022-03-04

4. Creative Methods for Creativity Research(ers)? Speculations;Review of Research in Education;2022-03

5. The Rise and Fall of Evidence-Based Research;The Palgrave Handbook of Educational Leadership and Management Discourse;2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3