Abstract
Conflicting U.S. statutes exist governing adolescent sexuality. While parents are allowed to remove their children from sex education, they cannot prevent their children from procuring medical care and contraception without parental awareness or consent. I argue that specialized consent statutes—statutes which empower adolescents to seek confidential reproductive and sexual health care—are an inappropriate solution to adolescent sexuality because (1) they empower individuals whom we otherwise believe are not ready for autonomous decision-making; (2) they endorse deception, which is the wrong message to be sending to our children; and (3) they are illiberal in that they circumvent parental decision-making authority to promote a particular conception of the good life. I argue that we should rescind these statutes and return these decisions to the family.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Public Administration,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Sociology and Political Science
Reference53 articles.
1. Adolescents' capacities to provide voluntary informed consent: The effects of parental influence and medical dilemmas.
2. Jacobson v. Massachusetts (1905). 197 U.S. 11.
3. This legal issue is discussed by Mnookin and Weisberg , 1989 and Wardle , 1989.
4. “Parents' Rights vs. Minors' Rights Regarding the Provision of Contraceptives to Teenagers.”;Wardle;Nebraska Law Review,1989
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献