The American Abortion Controversy: Lessons from Cross-National Evidence

Author:

Nevitte Neil,Brandon William P.,Davis Lori

Abstract

Analyses of American public opinion about abortion rarely consider what light other cases might shed on the U.S. controversy. This paper argues that there are striking parallels between the politics of abortion in the U.S. and Canada. These parallels extend beyond courts and interest groups; they also apply to public opinion. Gallup data indicate aggregate similarities in how both publics view the legalization of abortion in the last fifteen years, and World Values Survey data show that Americans and Canadians hold similar views about abortion even when the controversy is lifted out of its legal context. Probit analysis demonstrates that the same variables similarly predict where these publics stand on abortion when health and discretionary aspects of the debate are taken into account. Postmaterialist value orientations may provide important clues about what future direction the abortion debate in the U.S. may take.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Public Administration,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Sociology and Political Science

Reference40 articles.

1. Canadian Gallup asked “In which of these specific cases would you think an abortion should be legal?: (A) If there is a strong chance of a serious defect in the baby? [67%]; (B) If the woman's health is endangered by the pregnancy? [82%]; (C) If agreed upon by a woman and her physician? [49%]; (D) If the family has a very low income and cannot afford any more children [34%]; (E) If it is within 5 months of conception [31%]; (F) If it is within 3 months of conception [44%]; (G) If conception is due to rape or incest? [75%]” (Gallup Report, October, 1990).

2. Roe v. Wade (1973). 410 U.S. 113.

3. Morgentaler v. The Queen (1988). 1 S.C.C. 30.

4. Value Change in Industrial Societies

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3